Domain Subtype 1
Depression Screening
Name of the measure; source citation
Patient Health Questionnaire -9 (PHQ-9)
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606-13.
Link to measure
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1495268/#app1
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.09.013
Purpose of the measure/target population (from source citation)
brief measure of depression severity, used to guide treatment decisions
Description of the measure: number of items etc (is it a screening tool, self-administered/parent child tool (face to face, observation), Administration, self report/child or adult, type of tool (screening/diagnostic)
screening tool; self-or interviewer-administered; self-report; adults 18 and older (alternate version for adolescents), severity of depression
Psychometric information - validity and reliability (Provide Links to original source)
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R.L. & Williams, J.B.W. The PHQ-9. J GEN INTERN MED 16, 606–613 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x;
Bhana A, Rathod SD, Selohilwe O, Kathree T, Petersen I. The validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire for screening depression in chronic care patients in primary health care in South Africa. BMC Psychiatry. 2015 May 23;15:118. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0503-0. PMID: 26001915; PMCID: PMC4446842.
Studies that have used the measure (citation, publications) Key papers specific to SA
Context (Country) - setting (national/regional, local, urban/rural ethnicity)
Tshwane District, South Africa, eThekwini South Africa
South Africa
Free state
Cape Town
Pretoria
Pietermaritzburg
Kwazulu-Natal province
Johannesburg
Adapted, including validation studies in South Africa, including translation
Carroll et al., (2020) coded for cross cultural adaption of PHQ-9, including in 3 studies in South Africa and one in Zimbabwe: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165178120300226?via%3Dihub;
translated into isiXhosa for use with adolescents: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X22006504
Translated into over 70 languages and dialects (see Pfizer Inc. Patient health questionnaires (PHQ) screeners, official website. (2013). http://www.phqscreeners.com/overview.aspx?Screener=02_PHQ-9;
Domain Subtype 2
Common Mental Disorders experienced by outpatients (five underlying symptom dimensions—sommatization, obsessive-compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, anxiety and depression)
Name of the measure; source citation
Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL)
Derogatis, L. R. e. a., et al. (1974). The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A measure of primary symptom dimensions. In P. Pichot & R. Olivier-Martin (Eds.), Psychological measurements in psychopharmacology. S. Karger. https://doi.org/10.1159/000395070
Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL), a self-report symptom inventory. Derogatis, L.R., Lipman, R.S., Rickles, K., Uhlenhuth, E.H., & Covi, L. (1974). The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory. Behavioural Science, 19, 1–15.
Citation for HSCL-25: Winokur A, Winokur DF, Rickels K, Cox DS. Symptoms of emotional distress in a family planning service: stability over a four-week period. Br J Psychiatry. 1984 Apr;144:395-9.
There are numerous versions: The most frequently used current versions are HSCL/HSCL-58 (1974), HSCL-25 (1984), SCL-90-R (1994), and the Brief Symptom Inventory (1993): https://eprovide.mapi-trust.org/instruments/hopkins-symptom-checklist-25-items
Link to measure
All versions of the HSCL-25 are available to order at hprt.gmh@gmail.com
Purpose of the measure/target population (from source citation)
The HSCL assesses 5 domains representative of the common mental disorder symptom configurations observed among outpatients. Studies in several populations have consistently shown that the total score on the HSCL is highly correlated with severe emotional distress of unspecified diagnosis.
Description of the measure: number of items etc (is it a screening tool, self-administered/parent-child tool (face-to-face, observation), Administration, self-report/child or adult, type of tool (screening/diagnostic)
Self-report, symptom inventory originally with 90 items
Respondents are requested to complete each item on a ‘how often’ basis. Occurrence is measured through the selection one of the following alternatives: 1 = never; 2 = seldom; 3 = often; and 4 = almost always. There is no time limit for the completion of the questionnaire. The questionnaire is scored and interpreted in terms of the separate scores for each of the five dimensions.
Psychometric information - validity and reliability (Provide Links to original source)
https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-01537933/document
Studies that have used the measure (citation, publications) Key papers specific to SA
Halvorsen, J.O., ; Kagee, A. (2010). Predictors of Psychological Sequelae of Torture among South African Former Political Prisoners.
Kagee, A., Saal, W., & Bantjes, J. (2017). Distress, depression and anxiety among persons seeking HIV testing. AIDS care, 29(3), 280-284.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, v25 n6 p989-1005 2010.
Context (Country) - setting (national/regional, local, urban/rural ethnicity)
Local, urban
Adapted, including validation studies in South Africa, including translation
Kagee, A. (2005). Symptoms of Distress and Posttraumatic Stress among South African Former Political Detainees, Ethnicity & Health, 10:2, 169-179, DOI: 10.1080/13557850500071244;
Kagee, A. & Martin, L. (2010). Symptoms of depression and anxiety among a sample of South African patients living with HIV, AIDS Care, 22:2, 159-165, DOI: 10.1080/09540120903111445
Domain Subtype 3
Mental disorders/non-specific psychological distress, depression (including suicidality), anxiety-related disorders and somatoform disorders
Name of the measure; source citation
Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ)
Self-reporting Questionnaire-20 (SRQ-20); Beusenberg M, Orley J. A user’s guide to the self-reporting questionnaire. Geneva: Division of Mental Health, World Health Organization; 1994.
Link to measure
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=A+user%E2%80%99s+guide+to+the+self+reporting+questionnaire&author=M+Beusenberg&author=J+Orley&publication_year=1994&
Purpose of the measure/target population (from source citation)
Screener for psychiatric disturbance, especially for use in developing countries; used with adults, adolescents
Description of the measure: number of items etc (is it a screening tool, self-administered/parent-child tool (face to face, observation), Administration, self-report/child or adult, type of tool (screening/diagnostic)
SRQ-20: 20-item self-report screening tool developed by the WHO specifically for LMIC primary healthcare settings; yes/no answer format; self- or interviewer-administered; additional items have been added to screen for psychotic disorder and substance use
Psychometric information - validity and reliability (Provide Links to original source)
Beusenberg, M., Orley, J. H., & World Health Organization. (1994). A User´s guide to the self reporting questionnaire (SRQ (No. WHO/MNH/PSF/94.8. Unpublished). World Health Organization;
Cherian VI, Peltzer K, Cherian L. The factor-structure of the Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) in South Africa. East Afr Med J. 1998;75(11):654-656: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10065179/
Studies that have used the measure (citation, publications) Key papers specific to SA
van der Westhuizen C, Wyatt G, Williams JK, Stein DJ, Sorsdahl K. Validation of the Self Reporting Questionnaire 20-Item (SRQ-20) for Use in a Low- and Middle-Income Country Emergency Centre Setting. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2016 Feb 1;14(1):37-48. doi: 10.1007/s11469-015-9566-x. Epub 2015 Jun 30. PMID: 26957953; PMCID: PMC4779367;
Matimba & Ravhuhali, Khuliso & Kuonza, Lazarus & Mathee, Angela & Kgalamono, Spo & Made, Felix & Tlotleng, Nonhlanhla & Kootbodien, Tahira & Ntlebi, Vusi & Wilson, Kerry & Naicker, Nisha. (2019). Common Mental Health Disorders among Informal Waste Pickers in Johannesburg, South Africa 2018—A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 16. 2618. 10.3390/ijerph16142618.
Context (Country) - setting (national/regional, local, urban/rural ethnicity)
Cape Town, South Africa
Johannesburg, South Africa
for use in developing/low- and middle-income countries
Adapted, including validation studies in South Africa, including translation
Stein, D.J.; Sorsdahl, K. Validation of the self-reporting questionnaire 20-item (SRQ-20) for use in a low-and middle-income country emergency center setting. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2016, 14, 2–4.